A Challenge for Multi-party Decision Making: Malicious Argumentation Strategies

Andrew Kuipers and Jörg Denzinger

appeared in:
Proc. FLAIRS 2017, Marco Island, 2017, pp. 574-579.


Abstract

We present the concept of malicious argumentation strategies that extends malicious argumentation tactics to manipulate the outcome of an argumentation based decision making process with resource limits. We give an example of such a strategy, Exhaust and Protract, and show in a decision making example how Exhaust and Protract can be used to change the result of the decision making process.


Download full paper (publisher's page)

Generated: 15/8/17